My first blog post of the year 😊

Eligibility

Eligibility for the UK Global Talent Visa really depends on the endorsing body. Even within Arts Council England endorsement, it varies between Fashion, Architecture, and Film & TV, each with different expectations.

For Arts Council England (ACE) candidates, you’ll generally need at least three years of track record/experience to apply under Exceptional Promise. You can submit up to 10 pieces of evidence, alongside three referees who can vouch for your work.

For scientists and researchers applying through the Peer Review route, the process is slightly different. You’ll need one personal recommendation from a leading expert in your field. The application should also demonstrate a strong track record, typically through publications, lectures, research projects, patents, and personal statements.

The key takeaway? Whether you’re an artist or a scientist, proving your calibre and potential impact is essential.

Step-by-step process

Before diving into an application, start by reviewing your CV and experience. Ask yourself: Do I meet the eligibility criteria?

✅ If the answer is a confident yes, begin compiling your evidence immediately.
🤔 If you're unsure or need expert guidance on structuring your application, you’re in the right place! This is where I come in. Send me your CV, and I’ll assess your case and advise whether you should apply—or if more preparation is needed.

To make things clearer, I’ve outlined my step-by-step process in the Endorsement Timeline below:

📌 Week 1 – CV & experience review
📌 Week 2 – Assess evidence, identify strengths & weaknesses and draw up the action plan for the next few weeks
📌 Weeks 3-12 – Prepare documents, recommendations & submit
📌 Weeks 12-20 – Home Office/Endorsing Body considers application
📌 Weeks 20-21 – ✅ Endorsement successful → Apply for the visa!
📌 Weeks 20-28 – ❌ Refusal? You can request an Endorsement Review

This process isn’t always straightforward, and that’s why understanding the requirements in advance is so important. See the timeline below for a visual breakdown.

Common pitfalls and misconceptions

Some lawyers may disagree, but I see very little downside in applying for an endorsement—except for the cost. A refusal does not affect your immigration history or count as a visa refusal. Plus, if your application is unsuccessful, you receive detailed feedback that can help you improve and reapply.

However, many applicants overlook seemingly minor technicalities in the guidance, which can jeopardise their application. Common mistakes include:

❌ Misclassifying evidence (e.g., placing media recognition under the wrong category, unclear on what constitutes an award of excellence)
❌ Misunderstanding evidence requirements (how many pieces of media recognition and exhibition/ performance exhibition and from where)
❌ Submitting an application that lacks a cohesive narrative of achievements - the endorsing bodies want to see how your work ties together to support the assertion of a world-leading exceptional talent, or a candidate showing exceptional promise to become a world-leading talent in the field.

These details can make or break an application, and expert guidance can significantly increase your chances of success.

🚫 You don’t need 10 pieces of evidence.
A lot of people assume they must submit 10. Not true! That’s the cap, not the requirement. The endorsing bodies set a maximum of 10 because they can’t review unlimited evidence. If 6-8 strong pieces tell your story effectively, that’s way better than cramming in weaker ones just to hit a number.

🚫 A refusal won’t affect your immigration history.
This isn’t a visa application—it’s just an endorsement request. If you’re refused, it won’t show up as a visa refusal or impact future applications. Plus, you get detailed feedback on why it was rejected, so you can refine and try again.

🚫 You don’t need decades of experience to qualify.
A lot of people think the Global Talent Visa is only for top industry veterans. Not true! If you're earlier in your career but already making an impact, the Exceptional Promise route is designed for exactly that—high potential, not just years in the field.

💡 The Global Talent Visa UK is a competitive but exciting opportunity for professionals in arts, tech, science, and research. If you're unsure whether you qualify or need help structuring your application, send me your CV for an expert assessment.

I’ve worked with many incredible talents from all disciplines, and every case is a unique challenge I genuinely enjoy. If you're thinking of applying, let's connect—I’d love to help you navigate the process and put your best case forward.

If you’re a student graduating this year…

학생,

이번 졸업하나?

졸업 이후 어떤 비자로 전환할지 고민 된다면 …

이걸 보게나. 도움이 될걸세.

Global Talent vs. Graduate Visa 중 어떤걸로 진행하는 것이 좋을지 고민되는 당신, 일단 많은 재능을 가진것에 축하하고, 둘째 옵션이 있다는 것에 또 축하!

본론으로 가서,

Global Talent

장점:

1. Endorsement 신청은 필수

2. 물론 endorsement 자격이 되어야 함

3. Exceptional Promise 자격으로 신청한다면 고민이 될수 있는것이 ‘early stages of career’ 시점에서 신청하는 게 맞거든. 그렇다면 졸업과 동시에 신청하는 것이 비교적 ‘early stage’ 이니까 유리하겠지. 하지만 1-2년 정도의 시간을 갖고 endorsement 자료 (곧 경력)을 준비하는 것이 필요할 경우도 있으니 바로 endorsement 가 않 되더라도 당황하지않기.

4. Endorsement 되에 다른 자격 조건은 거의 없음. 영어 시험이나 기존의 학생 비자로 와서 공부한 코스를 졸업 해야 허거나 패스 해야 하는 등 조건이 전혀 없음.

단점:

1. Endorsement 라는 절차의 난이도가 graduate visa 보다는 높다는거. (경험 많은) 변호사 꼭 필요함.

2. Global Talent visa 자체는 Super Priority Service 로 (추가비용 발생) 진행하면 48시간 내에도 신청 결과를 받아 볼수 있지만, 그 전 단계인 endorsement 신청은 준비 시간 제외 하고도 6-8주 정도 걸린다는 거.

Graduate Visa

장점:

1. 졸업만 하면 비자 신청 조건은 8할 다 갖춤

2. 비자 신청이 바로 가능하니 역시 Priority Service route 로 진행하면 신청일로 부터 거의 바로 받아 볼 수 있음.

3. 신청서도 간단함. 변호사 없이도 거의 혼자 할 수 있음.

단점:

1. 꼭 졸업을 해야만 가능한 비자. 기존 학생비자로 공부한 코스를 끝내지 않거나 fail 하면 graduate visa 는 물 건너감. 신청 자격 미달.

2. Global Talent 랑 달라서 졸업 사실 외 에도 필요한 것이 많음. Financial Requirement?

3. 최대 2년 비자 (PhD 는 3년까지), 하지만 결과적으로 영주권으로 진행 안됨

4. Immigration Health Surcharge 를 내야 하는데, 이 부분은 사실 Global Talent 비자랑 다를 건 없지만 그래도 단점인이유가 graduate visa 기간은 나중에 5년 영주권 기간에 포함이 안 되거든. 그럼에도 불구하고 일년에 £1,035씩 2년치를 내는 것이… 음 😑 학생들 budget 에는 부담스럽지 않을까 싶으네… (*IHS 곧 £1,035으로 인상 될 예정).

5. 신청 시점이 조금 까다로운데, 현재 학생 비자 만료일 이전, 하지만 졸업은 한 상태 내지는 졸업 확정이된 시점에서만 신청이 가능. 지금 marking boycott 도 돌고 있는걸로 보이는데, 아주 어려운 시간이겠어. 또 아주 좁은 신청 window 이지. 정신 바짝 차려서 비자 신청서 준비 및 Global Talent 비교자문 등 받을 시간도 계획 중 확보해 놓으면 좋음.

결론

Global Talent 가 visa hierarchy 로 봤을때 훨씬 더 generous 한 조건으로 거주가 가능 하니 long term 거주를 생각 하는경우 Graduate Visa 보다는 GT 로 가는 걸 100배 추천 하는 바임. 게다가 이제 곧 Immigration Health Surcharge 도40% 이상 인상 될 예정인데, Graduate Visa 는 global talent visa 가 도저히 도저히 안되겠다 싶을때 하도록 하게.

이걸 읽고도 그래도 고민이 안 풀리거나, 조금 더 개인적으로 파고 들은 자문이 필요하다면 언제든지 환영이니 연락 주도록.

The secret is out.

Not all Global Talent Visas are made to be equal.

Some are just ‘superior’ and affords you better opportunities than others. Some are harder to achieve while others have lower bar to entry. Of course, this blog can’t be a full comparative analysis. If we are to look at some of the more popular ones, we might start with the Arts vs. Sciences comparison (We’ll leave Tech way over there, because though they’re under the same visa category, they’re really in a league of their own). Let me pick 3 big-deal differences:

1. So, we already know there are two sub-categories under this route: Exceptional Talent and Exceptional Promise. For those in Arts, this distinction means Exceptional Talent = 3 years towards settlement, Exceptional Promise = 5 years towards settlement. For those in STEM, this distinction does not matter. All may apply to settle only after 3 years. The reason for this is a bit political but ostensibly it is because science and research are prioritised and encouraged under this visa. The quicker you get to settlement, the more you are likely to not leave the UK and make it your home.

2. When you apply for your settlement, you must show a record of your absences. For Global Talent, theses allowable absences mean only up to 6 months in any rolling period of 12 months (i.e. when you plan your travels, make sure you leave a gap of at least 6 months on either side of your single or cluster of travels within 12 months so you’re not caught by this restriction). There is one type of GT which sails through even requirements and that is those endorsed by STEM endorsing bodies (RAEng, British Academy, Royal Society, UKRI). If you have been away on a research project, these do not count towards ‘absences’ - effectively you can be out for as long as you need during your GT visa and still be able to return to the UK and apply to settle. Absolute bees knees. (N.B. How do you prove your research activities? Well, this is where it gets a bit tricky. What evidence you must prepare - if at all - depends wholly on your circumstances. Get legal advice or representation on this).

3. Did you know that almost all endorsements start with the first requirement of Media Recognition evidence? It’s only recently been observed that there are significant discrepancy in this requirement between the different disciplines. I wrote about this in my previous blog on Fashion Designers. Whereas for those applying under the arts and architecture may provide media recognition evidence e.g. a newspaper or magazine article which eulogises a group exhibition or project without naming the applicant, as long as you could provide a supporting letter from the project’s lead confirming your significant contribution, this sort of ‘leeway’ is not afforded to Fashion Designers. For Fashion Designer applicants, you must find media recognition pieces which mention you by name and discusses your work as an individual designer. It would be fine to showcase your work which you produced while under the employ of another fashion house or a designer as long as your work under your name is critiqued.

And I’ll be back soon with some other points of interest on Global Talent Visa! In the meantime, do get in touch if you need my assistance.

So, it's that time of the year again. 

The latest stats on how many applied and were un/successful are in. This time I have obtained the nationality breakdown as well as the art field breakdown which should hopefully give you a better understanding of how the 'Artist Visa' has grown in popularity in the recent years (and why the additional 1,000 allocation  - albeit available for all 5 Designated Competent Bodies, not just to the Arts Council - could actually be useful for artists). These stats take us only up to April 2018. Of course, future stats from April 2018 onwards will be requested and shared with you in due course 

First, how many have applied and how many were successful: 

As we saw last year, there was a sudden surge of applicants under this route in 2016. It may be that this route was a bit more widely promoted by the likes of moi (*smug hair-flick*) or is a coincidence. Whatever is the case, I find that a lot more people are now aware of this route than ever before. This is the reason for the slightly lower success rate in percentage (%) but if you look at the sheer number of applicants who apply and eventually succeed, you can be sure that more people are applying and are succeeding than before. 

Second, from which countries do the applicants come from? 

So, Americans form the majority of applicants, circling above 30s-40s. 2017 appears to have been somewhat of a climax in all aspects of the stats under this route in that we saw double the no. of American applying that year and this probably accounted for the increase in the number of applicants across all art disciplines as well. 

Most English-speaking and Commonwealth countries (Australia, Canada, NZ) appear to produce the next highest average number of applicants between 11 - 25 across the four years (2015 - 2018), with Asian countries trailing a bit behind these. 

Of the Asian countries, South Korea appears to be in the lead though, having produced an average of just under 10 applicants each year between 2015 - 2018 while Japan has produced just under half of that number. 

N.B. I haven't included the figures for dual-nationals here though. But they form a very small number in any case. 

Third, in which art disciplines were the applications received?

So, of those who applied in each year, we can see that Music still makes up the majority of applicants. 

Finally, some news regarding which area of arts will be covered.

You might have already seen from my recent post "Tier 1 Exceptional Talent Update: Here come the Fashion!" that the previously excluded discipline of Fashion Design is now included and Fashion Designers of world-leading talent may be assessed for a visa by British Fashion Council (which sits under Arts Council England for the purpose of Tier 1 endorsement). 

I have not seen many but there is another category called 'combined arts' - lovely and vague. Arts Council's own guide on its website appears to define it as follows 'Festivals and carnival arts describe a range of activities that come under our combined arts discipline’ which includes music, dance, visual and live performance arts, theatre, literature and other combined arts. My question to them was to clarify whether 'combined arts' as an art discipline is only assessed in the context of a festival/ carnival, or whether can the same Tier 1 criteria be used to assess an individual artist who may engage in as many arts areas (e.g. literature & Dance, jewellery design & illustrations) as well?

Here is their answer:

"Combined Arts covers many areas of artistic practise:
 
Traditionally, Combined Arts does refer to festivals, carnivals, multi disciplinary events, large outdoor events, parades etc  
 
If a Tier 1 applicant is involved in delivering/has worked within any of the above areas they would be considered as a Combined Arts practitioner. However, a Tier 1 applicant who worked within a number of areas of artistic practise, such as literature, theatre and music could be considered as a Combined Arts (multi disciplinary) practitioner but we would expect that they plan to gain entry to the UK to work specifically and equally in each of these areas. 
 
Ideally, applicants who work in various single areas of artistic practise should identify their main specialism that they wish to work within in the UK, rather than Combined Arts however, when we receive an application we can liaise with the applicant via UKVI to determine the most appropriate artform to select for applicants if we are unsure." 

Now, this last sentence (in bold) of their response is pretty significant I think. It sounds as though the Arts Council will discuss and if necessary allocate an appropriate art-area for an application where the relevant art area is not so clear cut! 

That's all folks! Until next year! 

If you want to test out your credential and have a got at applying for a Tier 1 endorsement, feel free to contact me for consultation. 

The long wait is finally over for you fashion bods. The most recent of the regular Home Office statement of changes to the Immigration Rules, announced from today JUNE 2018 (HC 1154) brings the welcome news. 

Those of you who are following my blog here on Tier 1 Exceptional Talent, you might remember my post from last year (March 2017, Tier 1 Artist Visa - Is my art covered?) which lists the areas of art that the Arts Council England is prepared to assess for the purpose of UKVI's Tier 1 Exceptional Talent Endorsement. The message from the Arts Council to date (including the most recent response I received from them at the end of May 2018) has been that most areas of fashion design are expressly NOT INCLUDED to be assessed. This has turned away many a saddened - but incredibly talented - fashion designers from attempting Tier 1 Exceptional Talent while their visual arts peers triumphed. BUT NO MORE! THE OPPORTUNITY for fashion designers is NOW WIDE OPEN folks!

Just to explain the changes, Appendix L of the Immigration Rules houses the relevant part of the rules on Tier 1 Exceptional Talent/ Promise which, following the change, should now say this: 

"5. The applicant must either: 

(a) be established (if applying under the Exceptional Talent criteria) as, or demonstrate potential (if applying under the Exceptional Promise criteria) to become, a leading artist or an internationally recognised expert within the fields of arts and culture, encompassing dance, music, theatre, combined arts, literature and visual arts (including museums and galleries), as assessed by Arts Council England; or

(b) be established as a leading artist or an internationally-recognised expert within the film, television, animation, post-production and visual effects industry, as assessed by the Producers Alliance for Cinema and Television (PACT); or

(c) be established (if applying under the Exceptional Talent criteria) as, or demonstrate potential (if applying under the Exception Promise criteria) to become, an internationally recognised expert in their field within the fashion industry through the operation of leading designer fashion businesses (encompassing relevant technical), as assessed by the British Fashion Council.”

So, this means that in terms of allocation of endorsement places, Arts Council will still be the umbrella endorsement body for both PACT and the British Fashion Council and they will hold min. 250 allocations for each year (to be used by Arts Council, PACT, and the British Fashion Council), plus a further number if Arts Council (or PACT or BFC) runs out of its allocation. (N.B. Just beware that at the time of writing, the policy guidance on Tier 1 exceptional talent v. 1/2018 and Appendix L have yet to be updated with the new changes but we should see an updated policy guidance and to the rules in the coming days).

You might guess from my overall tone, I am SUPER excited to share this with you and I would totally encourage those with a good track record of international exposure, vision, and eminent referees to start preparing your first application! Of course, I am here to help you through the preparation and the ultimate application - just get in touch. I will always be excited to hear from you! It couldn't have come at a better time to coincide with the release of the documentary, 'McQueen' I feel. Almost poetic. 

A burning question from all applicants - Is my art covered by this visa?

The more creative and esoteric or pioneering a discipline you pursue, the more pertinent this questions will be for you. For example, considering my cultural proximity to Korea and K-Pop, I receive these questions often. I've finally received a response - of a kind - from Arts Council England this month.

As suspected, the areas of art assessed by the Council appears to be rather 'traditional' e.g. for Dance = Ballet, Music = traditional instrumentalist, but do read on and draw your own impression/ conclusion.

I've shared both my questions and their response below as they were received.

1.      Specifically please could you confirm whether the following Visual Arts disciplines are assessed by ACE for endorsement:

a.     ceramics, 

b.    drawing, 

c.     painting, 

d.    sculpture, 

e.     printmaking, 

f.      Book Arts,

g.     Textile design, 

h.       crafts, 

i.       photography, 

j.       architecture,

k.     industrial design, 

l.       graphic design, 

m.     fashion design, 

n.    interior design,

o.     decorative art,

For Visual Arts we assess a wide variety of disciplines. From the list of disciplines provided most of these (apart from industrial design, *most areas of fashion design, **some areas of graphic design, architecture and interior design) are assessed by Arts Council England.

Ceramics, Textile design and Crafts (*including some areas that could be classified as fashion design) would need to be items specifically made for exhibition and not for commercial purposes. For example – ‘The making of notionally functional or decorative crafted objects. A crafted object is one which has been made by hand, not manufactured (although it may include limited production runs using automated or semi-automated processes eg printing on textiles). It has often been made by the hand of the product's designer, and shows their skill and creativity. Crafts include traditional/heritage crafts which use skills and techniques that have been passed down from generation to generation and contemporary crafts using characterised by innovative techniques and use of materials.’

**Some areas of graphic design, architecture and interior design can be considered however, this cannot be commercial, must be specifically related to the arts and cannot include production or construction of items/buildings.

As there is not an exhaustive list of every discipline that we assess, we advise applicants in our published eligibility guidance that applicants should contact us if they require advice on what disciplines we do or do not assess.

  4. Specifically please could you confirm whether the following Music disciplines are assessed by ACE for endorsement under Tier 1 Exceptional Talent/ Promise:

a.        K-Pop (Korean Pop) music performers (singers, group members)

b.        K-pop concert designers, concert/ music video producers and directors, musicians,

c.         Contemporary music band members (heavy metal, rock, indie genre), alternatively, a list of musical genres covered by ACE

For Music we assess a wide variety of disciplines. From the list provided we could consider all of the disciplines listed. In general for music we support:

Classical, Baroque, Early Music, Chamber, Orchestral, Choral, Choirs, Vocal Ensembles, Gospel, Brass bands, Opera, Popular (pop, rock, soul, country, funk, hip-hop, r&b, urban, blues, singer-songwriters, electronic music), Jazz, Experimental, Swing, Big Band, Folk (traditional music and song indigenous to the British Isles), World Music (music primarily associated with a specific nation outside of the British Isles)

Members of bands or groups will need to apply separately and provide evidence that proves their individual promise/talent – in accordance with the eligibility criteria.

As there is not an exhaustive list of every discipline that we assess, we advise applicants in our published eligibility guidance that applicants should contact us if they require advice on what disciplines we do or do not assess.

5.     Finally, The composition of the decision-making panel at ACE.

Arts Council England are not the decision makers for Tier 1 Visas. The application and decision-making process is undertaken by the Home Office. Arts Council England's role is to provide an assessment of an application against the published criteria for Exceptional Talent/Promise – which is carried out by one of our pool of artform specialists from our teams across the country – which is then moderated and signed off by a Senior Manager who checks that guidance has been followed appropriately before returning the recommendation to the Home Office.

As usual, my thoughts on any potential applicants for endorsement is that an endorsement application is infinitely worth a try (rather than not). A refusal from this application does not prejudice any future visa application and unlike a visa application, it does not require you to surrender your passport for assessment. Ultimately the more esoteric your discipline, the stronger the case for making an application for Art Council to assess. Therefore, the only way to 'find out' your chances of success is to prepare and submit an application straight away. 

If you would like to start an assessment of your application, please contact me here.