An old client contacted me, enquiring whether I could help her GT extension application.

Extension? But hasn’t it already been 5 years for you? (Meaning, why not ILR?)

Yeah, but I don’t think I have the wear withal to sit and pass the Life in the UK Test in time for my visa expiry.

What?! 😳 Are you sure? LIUK shouldn’t be that hard, especially people who have already lived and worked here. Don’t fear it. At least have a go, if you fail you can then decide to extend and of course do the text again.

Oh, do you think so? Maybe I’ve been too fearful. Maybe it’s better to try LIUK and settlement application.

🤔 🤨 🧐

At this point, I began to wonder if they knew of the cost difference between the two routes, you know, between extending even for just one year to give yourself that time to study for and sit the LIUK exam vs. forging ahead with it now, with some grit, and so apply for ILR - be done and dusted with visas.

Here’s what went through my mind:

Global Talent Extension:

• required evidence of income earned in the endorsement field - just like an application for ILR. Same level of evidence and efforts are needed as ILR. If self employed and filed Self Assessment tax forms, would most likely need help from an accountant to confirm your UK income.

• Sure, you could apply for an extension from outside the UK, as well as inside it. But with the application fee of - as at Jan 2024 - is £716 and the health surcharge that is currently £624 for each year of visa and js due to increase to £1,035 for each year of visa at some point in “Spring 2024”, the total fee for extending for even just one year stands currently at £1,751. And don’t forget, a year later you would either repeat the extension at similar fee or apply for ILR which is £2,885. Add £1,000 for super priority service for quicker decisions = £3,885.

• £1,751 at extension + £3,885 at ILR = £5,636.

So, it’s simple maths at this point:

£5,626 or £3,885?

Do you see what I mean? Which would you choose?

🤔 🧐 🕵️

If you’re a student graduating this year…

학생,

이번 졸업하나?

졸업 이후 어떤 비자로 전환할지 고민 된다면 …

이걸 보게나. 도움이 될걸세.

Global Talent vs. Graduate Visa 중 어떤걸로 진행하는 것이 좋을지 고민되는 당신, 일단 많은 재능을 가진것에 축하하고, 둘째 옵션이 있다는 것에 또 축하!

본론으로 가서,

Global Talent

장점:

1. Endorsement 신청은 필수

2. 물론 endorsement 자격이 되어야 함

3. Exceptional Promise 자격으로 신청한다면 고민이 될수 있는것이 ‘early stages of career’ 시점에서 신청하는 게 맞거든. 그렇다면 졸업과 동시에 신청하는 것이 비교적 ‘early stage’ 이니까 유리하겠지. 하지만 1-2년 정도의 시간을 갖고 endorsement 자료 (곧 경력)을 준비하는 것이 필요할 경우도 있으니 바로 endorsement 가 않 되더라도 당황하지않기.

4. Endorsement 되에 다른 자격 조건은 거의 없음. 영어 시험이나 기존의 학생 비자로 와서 공부한 코스를 졸업 해야 허거나 패스 해야 하는 등 조건이 전혀 없음.

단점:

1. Endorsement 라는 절차의 난이도가 graduate visa 보다는 높다는거. (경험 많은) 변호사 꼭 필요함.

2. Global Talent visa 자체는 Super Priority Service 로 (추가비용 발생) 진행하면 48시간 내에도 신청 결과를 받아 볼수 있지만, 그 전 단계인 endorsement 신청은 준비 시간 제외 하고도 6-8주 정도 걸린다는 거.

Graduate Visa

장점:

1. 졸업만 하면 비자 신청 조건은 8할 다 갖춤

2. 비자 신청이 바로 가능하니 역시 Priority Service route 로 진행하면 신청일로 부터 거의 바로 받아 볼 수 있음.

3. 신청서도 간단함. 변호사 없이도 거의 혼자 할 수 있음.

단점:

1. 꼭 졸업을 해야만 가능한 비자. 기존 학생비자로 공부한 코스를 끝내지 않거나 fail 하면 graduate visa 는 물 건너감. 신청 자격 미달.

2. Global Talent 랑 달라서 졸업 사실 외 에도 필요한 것이 많음. Financial Requirement?

3. 최대 2년 비자 (PhD 는 3년까지), 하지만 결과적으로 영주권으로 진행 안됨

4. Immigration Health Surcharge 를 내야 하는데, 이 부분은 사실 Global Talent 비자랑 다를 건 없지만 그래도 단점인이유가 graduate visa 기간은 나중에 5년 영주권 기간에 포함이 안 되거든. 그럼에도 불구하고 일년에 £1,035씩 2년치를 내는 것이… 음 😑 학생들 budget 에는 부담스럽지 않을까 싶으네… (*IHS 곧 £1,035으로 인상 될 예정).

5. 신청 시점이 조금 까다로운데, 현재 학생 비자 만료일 이전, 하지만 졸업은 한 상태 내지는 졸업 확정이된 시점에서만 신청이 가능. 지금 marking boycott 도 돌고 있는걸로 보이는데, 아주 어려운 시간이겠어. 또 아주 좁은 신청 window 이지. 정신 바짝 차려서 비자 신청서 준비 및 Global Talent 비교자문 등 받을 시간도 계획 중 확보해 놓으면 좋음.

결론

Global Talent 가 visa hierarchy 로 봤을때 훨씬 더 generous 한 조건으로 거주가 가능 하니 long term 거주를 생각 하는경우 Graduate Visa 보다는 GT 로 가는 걸 100배 추천 하는 바임. 게다가 이제 곧 Immigration Health Surcharge 도40% 이상 인상 될 예정인데, Graduate Visa 는 global talent visa 가 도저히 도저히 안되겠다 싶을때 하도록 하게.

이걸 읽고도 그래도 고민이 안 풀리거나, 조금 더 개인적으로 파고 들은 자문이 필요하다면 언제든지 환영이니 연락 주도록.

The secret is out.

Not all Global Talent Visas are made to be equal.

Some are just ‘superior’ and affords you better opportunities than others. Some are harder to achieve while others have lower bar to entry. Of course, this blog can’t be a full comparative analysis. If we are to look at some of the more popular ones, we might start with the Arts vs. Sciences comparison (We’ll leave Tech way over there, because though they’re under the same visa category, they’re really in a league of their own). Let me pick 3 big-deal differences:

1. So, we already know there are two sub-categories under this route: Exceptional Talent and Exceptional Promise. For those in Arts, this distinction means Exceptional Talent = 3 years towards settlement, Exceptional Promise = 5 years towards settlement. For those in STEM, this distinction does not matter. All may apply to settle only after 3 years. The reason for this is a bit political but ostensibly it is because science and research are prioritised and encouraged under this visa. The quicker you get to settlement, the more you are likely to not leave the UK and make it your home.

2. When you apply for your settlement, you must show a record of your absences. For Global Talent, theses allowable absences mean only up to 6 months in any rolling period of 12 months (i.e. when you plan your travels, make sure you leave a gap of at least 6 months on either side of your single or cluster of travels within 12 months so you’re not caught by this restriction). There is one type of GT which sails through even requirements and that is those endorsed by STEM endorsing bodies (RAEng, British Academy, Royal Society, UKRI). If you have been away on a research project, these do not count towards ‘absences’ - effectively you can be out for as long as you need during your GT visa and still be able to return to the UK and apply to settle. Absolute bees knees. (N.B. How do you prove your research activities? Well, this is where it gets a bit tricky. What evidence you must prepare - if at all - depends wholly on your circumstances. Get legal advice or representation on this).

3. Did you know that almost all endorsements start with the first requirement of Media Recognition evidence? It’s only recently been observed that there are significant discrepancy in this requirement between the different disciplines. I wrote about this in my previous blog on Fashion Designers. Whereas for those applying under the arts and architecture may provide media recognition evidence e.g. a newspaper or magazine article which eulogises a group exhibition or project without naming the applicant, as long as you could provide a supporting letter from the project’s lead confirming your significant contribution, this sort of ‘leeway’ is not afforded to Fashion Designers. For Fashion Designer applicants, you must find media recognition pieces which mention you by name and discusses your work as an individual designer. It would be fine to showcase your work which you produced while under the employ of another fashion house or a designer as long as your work under your name is critiqued.

And I’ll be back soon with some other points of interest on Global Talent Visa! In the meantime, do get in touch if you need my assistance.